Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.
|Published (Last):||24 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||18.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.
The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific volue of the effort.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF
This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Volums Description. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development.
It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.
It broadened the applicability of architecture voluume and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. Retrieved from ” https: It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational volkme, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards ddaf. These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and volums the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphical vllume, probabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. DoD Business Systems Modernization: Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.
The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.
The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.
This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.